• Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
|
  • xmlui.dri2xhtml.structural.header.language

    Deutsch
  • Home
  • About
    • About GenderOpen
    • Policy
    • FAQ
  • Browse
    • Ressource Type
    • Year of publication
    • Author
    • Subject
    • This Collection
    • Year of publication
    • Author
    • Subject
  • Search
  • Submit
  • Cooperations
View Item 
  •   GenderOpen Home
  • Publikationstypen
  • Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
  • View Item
  •   GenderOpen Home
  • Publikationstypen
  • Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25595/1474
Title
Reproduction, Politics, and John Irving’s The Cider House Rules : Women’s Rights or "Fetal Rights"?
Author(s)
Wahlström, Helena
Journal Title
Culture unbound : Journal of current cultural research
Year of publication
2013
Volume
5
Issue number
2
Page reference
251-271
Language
englisch
Abstract
While hotly debated in political contexts, abortion has seldom figured in explicit terms in either literature or film in the United States. An exception is John Irving’s 1985 novel The Cider House Rules, which treats abortion insistently and explicitly. Although soon thirty years old, The Cider House Rules still functions as an important voice in the ongoing discussion about reproductive rights, responsibilities, and politics. Irving represents abortion as primarily a women’s health issue and a political issue, but also stresses the power and responsibility of men in abortion policy and debate. The novel rejects a “prolife” stance in favor of a women’s rights perspective, and clearly illustrates that abortion does not preclude or negate motherhood. This article discusses Irving’s novel in order to address abortion as a political issue, the gender politics of fictional representations of abortion, and the uses of such representations in critical practice. A brief introduction to the abortion issue in American cultural representation and in recent US history offers context to the abortion issue in Irving’s novel. The analysis focuses on abortion as it figures in the novel, and on how abortion figures in the criticism of the novel that explicitly focuses on this issue. The article argues that twentyfirst century criticism of Irving’s text, by feminist scholars as well as explicitly anti-feminist pro-life advocates, demonstrate the pervasive influence of antiabortion discourses illustrates, since these readings of Irving’s novel include, or reactively respond to, the fetal rights discourse and the “awfulization of abortion.” The article further proposes that the novel’s representations of reproductive rights issues – especially abortion – are still relevant today, and that critical readings of fictional and nonfictional representations of reproductive rights issues are central to feminist poli-tics.
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.25595/1474
Publication type
Zeitschriftenartikel
Details
Files in this item
File
Description
Size
Format
cu13v5a17.pdf
Download File
201.0 Kb
Adobe PDF
Export
BibTexEndnoteRIS
  • Data privacy
  • |
  • Imprint
  • |
  • Contact