Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.denone
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Bridget
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-02T19:51:48Z
dc.date.available2023-11-02T19:51:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.genderopen.de/25595/2293
dc.description.abstractThe Capability Approach/Capability Theory (CA/T) makes the normative claim that freedom to achieve well-being is of primary moral importance. It has made significant contributions in its original field of Development Studies and has also been used in other fields as a framework to assess the relation between well-being and socio-economic contexts, to inform policies for social change. CA/T’s move from a focus only on resources (redistribution) reveals how the relation between the elements of participation and freedom in the achievement of well-being becomes contested. This paper will use two examples from empirical research conducted with disabled people, their personal assistants and care workers to explore how attention to participation, connection, and affiliation can further develop CA/T.none
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.subjectCarenone
dc.subjectBehinderungnone
dc.subjectEthiknone
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaftennone
dc.titleCapability, Care, and Personal Assistance:Making Connectionsnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25595/2287
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
dc.source.journalOpen Gender Journalnone
dc.source.volume5none
dc.identifier.pihttps://doi.org/10.17169/ogj.2021.109none
local.typeZeitschriftenartikel
local.freeculturelicence.internhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.denone


Dateien in dieser Publikation

Thumbnail

Diese Publikation erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige