Show simple item record

dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
dc.contributor.authorBull, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T18:40:57Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T18:40:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issnissn:2512-5192
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.genderopen.de/25595/2880
dc.description.abstractTackling gender-based violence and harassment (GBVH) is an increasingly urgent task for higher education institutions (HEIs) globally. This article explores why HEIs take different approaches in the enactment of policies tackling GBVH. Through a comparative case study approach exploring two contrasting English HEIs, it focuses on one specific aspect of policy implementation that has been a particular challenge: formal report handling. One HEI had implemented national legal guidance in this area, while the other had not. In neither case were HEIs’ work in this area primarily driven by the national guidance; instead a proactive response in one HEI was shaped by a ‘watershed case’ of sexual violence. The article problematises analyses that homogenise the HE sector as taking a uniform approach on this issue, revealing a more complicated reality where institutional actors are highly aware of problems with institutional processes, and where cultures around GBVH shape policy implementation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectHigher Education
dc.subjectSexual Harassment
dc.subjectUniversity
dc.subjectViolence
dc.subject.ddcddc:300
dc.titleThe Role of “Watershed Cases“ in Implementing Policies on Gender-Based Violence and Harassment in English Higher Education Institutions
dc.typearticle
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25595/2874
dc.source.pageinfo1–24
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalOpen Gender Journal
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.volume9
dc.identifier.pihttps://doi.org/10.17169/OGJ.2025.301
local.typeZeitschriftenartikel


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record