Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25595/326
Author(s)
Hark, Sabine
Journal Title
Amerikastudien : Amst ; a quarterly = American studies
Year of publication
2001
Volume
46
Issue number
1
Page reference
87-103
Language
englisch
Abstract
When Judith Butler's Gender Trouble appeared in German translation in 1991, the book launched a heated debate among German academic feminists about the status of gender as a category of analysis, and about the future of feminist theory. Tue anxieties were quite fundamental. Is "gender" a category of "nature" or "culture"? And if its "nature" is entirely cultural, a social construction, how can we then speak and act in the name of a gender, i.e., in the name of women? Much of this debate was coded as a conflict between different feminist generations. This trope of "generation" served as a strategy of displacement: "queer issues" figured as a kind of absent/present threat haunting the coherence of Gender Studies as a legitimate field of knowledge, but they were hardly made an explicit subject of discussion. This essay will look at the conscious and unconscious levels of discourse: What is the "positive unconscious" of the socalled "Butler debate"? Who gets to say what and how? What defines an "intelligible" object of study? Who gets to define it? In short, what is the "order of things" that frames discourse? Even if queer theory has had no manifest impact on the definition of Women's and Gender Studies, how did the specter of "queer" structure feminist theory on an unconscious level? And above all, what does all this mean for the future of German academic feminism(s)?
Subject
Queer
Dichotomie
Feminismus
Wissenschaft
Gender
Dichotomie
Feminismus
Wissenschaft
Gender
Publication type
Zeitschriftenartikel
Files in this item
File
Description
Size
Format
Hark_Disputed_Territory_Feminist_Studies_in_Germany_and_Its_Queer_Discontents Kopie.pdf
4.937 Mb
Adobe PDF