Show simple item record

dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.denone
dc.contributor.authorFortin-Rittberger, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T14:02:13Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T14:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1938-274Xnone
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.genderopen.de/25595/472
dc.description.abstractAlthough the majority of studies on political knowledge document lingering gender-based differences in advanced industrial democracies, most contributors have drawn such conclusions from a single or a handful of countries, using limited batteries of political information items. Exploiting a pooled data set of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems encompassing 106 post-election surveys in forty-seven countries between 1996 and 2011, this article demonstrates that survey instrument–related factors, such as question format and content, as well as the overall difficulty of questions, are more consequential in shaping the size of gender gaps in political knowledge than institutional factors, such as electoral rules or opportunity structures. The research design of this article draws from almost three hundred different items measuring factual political knowledge using the broadest country coverage and most comprehensive approach to measurement to date.none
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.subjectGendernone
dc.subjectPolitiknone
dc.subjectWissennone
dc.subjectWissenschaftnone
dc.subjectGender Biasnone
dc.subjectDemokratienone
dc.subject.ddc320 Politikwissenschaftnone
dc.titleCross-National Gender Gaps in Political Knowledge : How Much Is Due to Context?none
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25595/466
dc.source.pageinfo391-402none
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
dc.source.journalPolitical Research Quarterlynone
dc.source.issue3none
dc.source.volume69none
dc.identifier.pi10.1177/1065912916642867none
local.typeZeitschriftenartikel


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record